.

Superintendent: No New Funding to LCUSD from Prop 30

With all of the hype surrounding Proposition 30, and its passage on Election Day, the LCUSD Superintendent shines a light on the bottom line: state funding will remain inadequate, and mirror levels of 2011-12.

Superintendent Wendy Sinnette drafted this letter to La Cañada, walking folks through the budgetary implications for La Cañada Unified School District and its 4,117 students.

Dear LCUSD Community,

The dust continues to settle given the results of last week’s election.  The passage of Proposition 30 brings some measure of immediate relief to school districts throughout California, but it also creates an unprecedented urgency for pervasive communication and messaging from local district’s - because the financial problems facing our schools have only been mitigated, not eliminated.

NO NEW FUNDS FOR LA CAÑADA SCHOOLS

The marketing campaign from Sacramento associated with Proposition 30 was oversold to the public.  It claimed to “fix” the problems with districts’ budgets and the crisis we have been facing for five years regarding school finance in California.  That is simply not the case.

The passage of Proposition 30 prevents a $455 cut per student in the current school year and subsequent years projected until 2015 – 2016.  With the District’s current enrollment at 4117, we averted an annual cut of over $1.8 million.  However, Proposition 30 provides NO new dollars for schools.  Instead of additional massive cuts, we are instead faced with a flat funding reality; the same level of funding we received in 2011-2012, which we all know was inadequate.

LA CAÑADA SCHOOLS HAVE ABSORBED FUNDING CUTS FOR FIVE CONSECUTIVE YEARS

“Flat funding” means current year funding at $557 per pupil below the levels LCUSD saw in 2007 – 2008.  This equates to a current $2.2 million dollar cut to revenues from those the District received 5 years ago, before the onslaught of Sacramento cuts.  If you total the cumulative per pupil reductions since 2007 – 2008 they equal $2,716 per student – $10.8 million of actual cuts to our schools.  In terms of comprehensive revenue reductions, not just dollars we were cut but dollars we should have received from statutorily anticipated cost of living adjustments, the District has lost more than $20 million in funding since 2007-2008.

DEFICIT-SPENDING FOR THE FORSEEABLE FUTURE

What these levels of cuts create in the District’s budget is a structural deficit.  LCUSD has done better than most districts thanks to the stewardship of the Governing Board; the generosity of our parents and community members in the form of gifts to the La Canada Flintridge Educational Foundation (LCFEF), Parent Teacher Associations, and specialized support groups at the school sites; the community of La Canada Flintridge’s voter approved 2009 Parcel Tax; the concessions by our labor associations – the La Canada Teachers’ Association and the California State Employees’ Association; and the on-going budget reduction strategies implemented by management staff over the past five years.  But, a structural deficit – by its very nature, results in deficit spending.  In our budget’s multi-year projections the District is deficit spending over $547,000 in 2012-2013; $629,000 in 2013-2014; and $1.7 million in 2014-2015, the first school year without the parcel tax.

 

NO EASY FIXES

So, while Proposition 30 spared LCUSD over $1.8 million in annual and on-going additional cuts, it did not “fix” our District’s funding problem.  To actually solve the problem it will take a level of communication, transparency, and community involvement – the likes of which we have never seen.  You have my commitment to that charge.  I am also keenly sensitive to the fact that the effects of Proposition 30, namely its increases to sales tax and personal income tax, will hit the people of La Canada Flintridge harder than most communities.  Additionally, over the past five years, our parents and community members have been supporting our schools at unprecedented levels.  Whether it has been through increased donations to the Foundation, to school support groups, or via the parcel tax, the community has stepped up to the plate and provided local support to the District, allowing us to maintain our schools and their programs at its high levels of quality.  The reality that Proposition 30 has not “fixed” the short- or long-term fiscal crisis the District faces will likely be an unpopular one, but hopefully one that we can message and solve together - as a community united in placing its children and the quality of their education first.

Sincerely yours,

Wendy Sinnette

Superintendent

Debra Davis November 19, 2012 at 07:35 PM
It seems like averting ANY cut in funds to schools is a good thing, even if there isn't any "new funding," per se. If Prop 30 averted $1.8 million in cuts, that's good!
Anne Tryba November 19, 2012 at 09:42 PM
I agree with you Debra. To those of us who actually sought election information resources besides paid partisan advertising, it was clear that the best Prop 30 could do would be to avert even steeper cuts to our schools. When I read Ms. Sinette's letter, I was surprised at her emphasis on the "not a fix" aspect of the Prop 30 funding. But upon deeper reflection, given that Proposition 30 was opposed in La Cañada by the majority (4,831 votes to 3,306) she may be hearing from some of those voters who were opposed to the proposition. Although we have always been a generous community when it comes to funds for the LCFEF, she has her work cut out for her to communicate with those who refuse to understand that public schools must have--and deserve--public funding and support.
hayes November 23, 2012 at 10:20 AM
go by few Mexicans see this http://www.coachoutletwr.com Coach Bags Outlet as a serious issue.Suggestions http://www.coachoutletloa.com Coach Factory Online flooded in for a new name for Mexico, many of them http://www.coachoutletonlineyu.net Coach Factory Outlet Online mocking Mr Calderon, such as "Fraud-land" http://www.coachfactoryonlineen.com Coach Outlet Online in reference to widespread corruption, http://www.hermesbeltsoutletsc.com Hermes Belt our correspondent says.The constitutional http://www.coachfactoryonlinesu.net Coach Factory Online reform Mr Calderon proposes needs to be http://www.coachoutletod.com Coach Outlet Store Online approved by both houses of Congress and http://www.coachfactoryoutletbo.net Coach Outlet a majority of Mexico's 31 http://www.coachfactoryoutletdt.us Coach Factory Online state legislatureComing with just http://www.coachoutletstoreonlinert.com Coach Factory Outlet a week to go before Mr Calderon http://www.coachoutletonlinelsa.com Coach Outlet Store leaves office, the president's critics http://www.coachoutletdt.net Coach Outlet see this as a symbolic gesture.Mr Calderon http://www.coachoutletyo.com Coach Outlet will hand over to president-elect http://www.coachbagsoutleton.org Coach Factory Online Enrique Pena Nieto of the http://www.louisvuittonbeltsdt.net Louis Vuitton Belts Institutional Revolutionary

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »